Featured Brokers



Princeton Real Estate






ROCKY HILL: Sudden death for districts with no schools
Thursday, July 2, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
By Kristine Snodgrass, Staff Writer

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:



   ROCKY HILL — The Rocky Hill School District has been shut down and will be merged into the Montgomery Township School District, as the result of legislation enacted this week that defines the procedure for the elimination of nonoperating school districts.

   The Board of Education received official notification from the state Department of Education on Wednesday that the district had been shut down, effective the same day.

   Department spokeswoman Kathryn Forsyth said 13 nonoperating districts statewide were eliminated Wednesday, July 1, to coincide with the start of the new fiscal year.

   With no school of its own, the Rocky Hill School District pays about $1.2 million in tuition annually to send nearly 100 of its residents’ children to Montgomery Township schools.

   Though it has increased significantly in the past two years, borough residents pay a significantly lower school tax rate than their neighbors in Montgomery Township.
   In the future, it is recommended that the borough’s tax levy be determined through a formula based on 38.5 percent equalized value of residents’ homes, with the remainder based on pupil enrollment, according to the state Department of Education.

   The legislation, signed into law by Gov. Jon Corzine on Tuesday, clarified the procedures for executive county superintendents to eliminate nonoperating school districts and merge them into existing ones.

   Though it seems sudden, the shutdown has been long coming, Ms. Forsyth said. In 2007, the state Legislature passed a law requiring the elimination of nonoperating districts, which was supposed to be completed nearly a year ago.

   Rocky Hill was one of 26 nonoperating districts in the state, and one of two in Somerset County. The other, Millstone, was also shut down Wednesday and merged into the Hillsborough Township School District.

   The timing of the elimination of the 13 remaining nonoperating districts has not been determined, Ms. Forsyth said.

   The borough maintained its own Board of Education, whose responsibilities included overseeing finances, arranging transportation, arranging some special education and advocating for the borough’s children in Montgomery schools. There is currently no seat on the Montgomery Board of Education to represent Rocky Hill students.

   Under the new legislation, a representative from Rocky Hill will be appointed to Montgomery’s school board until the next election in April, when the seat is voted on at large.

   Officials are concerned that this means Rocky Hill will then no longer have a voice on the school board.

   ”It seems it would be very difficult for a Millstone or Rocky Hill resident to be elected to the receiving districts’ schools based on population,” said Frank Chilson, secretary for both school boards.

   An injunction was expected to be filed Wednesday on behalf of the Rocky Hill and Millstone school boards in an attempt to stop the shut down, he said. Among its objections, the injunction states that the community was not given the opportunity to vote on the issue, he said.

   ”It’s really taxation without representation,” Mr. Chilson.

   Borough Mayor Ed Zimmerman said he also is concerned about the disenfranchisement of Rocky Hill voters.

   ”The biggest issue here is we’ve got nine months of an appointed person over there and then we’ll never have a say in education again, or taxes,” he said.

   He added that the figures behind the decision to merge the districts were not provided to the borough, so the impact on taxpayers remains unclear.

   ”Nobody is saying it’s a bad idea. We just don’t have the information to know,” he said Wednesday.
   The Borough Council recently passed a resolution to enter into a professional services agreement with the law firm Lindabury, McCormick Estabrook & Cooper to conduct a study into the tax implications of a merger or regionalization of its school district at a cost of $3,000. The study has not been completed.

   The office of the county Superintendent of Schools declined to comment, directing calls to the state Department of Education. Somerset County Executive Superintendent of Schools Trudy Doyle was out of the office Wednesday.

   Gov. Corzine called the legislation a positive step toward school district consolidation.

   ”This legislation that I am signing is another important component in our effort to share services and reduce the size of government,” he said. “By merging with neighboring districts, students will receive the same quality education as before, and we will also begin to bring more rhyme and reason to our system of school districts across the state.”

   Montgomery Township School District Business Administrator Tom Venanzi said the only information the district had received was that the amount of local tax revenue that Rocky Hill had approved for its budget would be turned over to Montgomery for its operations next year.

   ksnodgrass

@centraljersey.com

Central Jersey MarketPlace Ads


Get latest Local Central Jersey News from CentralJersey.com
Comments
Comments are limited to 200 words or less.

Kris Kringle wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:37 PM:

" You have completely missed the point about property taxes paying for schools, "No Santa Claus Here".

Property owners pay taxes, and while the renter may not write a check to the local school district, the owner of the apartment DOES.

Renters do not get off without paying for school, the landlord figures that expense into his rent.

A head tax on school-age children may sound nice, but it is the wrong way to go. Shared support of the education system by all involved is best - if parents could opt-out then the remaining parents would wind up paying private school-like tuition bills.

As for the $120,000/yr property tax bill in Pennington - the tax rate in Pennington is $1.95 per hundred, which would put the value of their property at around $6 Million (if I did my math correct), I grew up in Pennington, and I dopn't think there is a $6 Million property in the borough. Are you sure your friend isn't in Hopewell Township? "

Rap wrote on Jul 8, 2009 2:34 PM:

" First off, I doubt anyone in Pennington pays $120,000 in taxes. Second, property owners pay the same property taxes as everyone else (school district, municipal, fire, county, etc) regardless of whether they have 0, 1, or 100 kids in a school system. This is true even in the case where a property is rented to someone who has kids in the school system or not. Presumably, a landlord will "bake" their taxes into the rent charged in some fashion.

The real problem is my point above, property owners pay the same taxes as everyone else (school district, municipal, fire, county, etc) regardless of whether they have 0, 1, or 100 kids in a school system. The way we fund school districts is extremely inequitable to property owners with no kids in school. Yeah, I know the argument that "someone" paid for taxes when I went to school or when my kids were in school.

So what's the solution?
Same as for colleges and private schools...everybody should pay based on attendance. Yes, people at lower incomes could be subsidized in some fashion or other, but, if you wanna breed like a rabbit and have 16 kids in the school and I choose to be childless, why should my tax burden be the same as yours??? "

Tony wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:29 PM:

" It is telling that there never seems to be any mention of how much money would actually be saved by eliminating the nonoperating districts. Perhaps it is because they are not the real problem, but just a diversion so those in Trenton can look like they are doing something. "

No Santa Claus Here wrote on Jul 3, 2009 3:33 PM:

" Its time for a new law to be added to the books.
People who rent apartments or home should pay some type of fee to help with the real estate taxes to pay for sevices , schools and sending their children to our schools for free. Not fair that we the home owner have to pay everything.
If a family lives in an apartment with 5 children they send their children to school for free while we as hard working home owners and tax payers have to pay $ 9,000 per child.
Get with it...... Children who live with their parents that live on private schools and militery bases send their children to our schools for free , they should pay something.
All children have the right to a education but it has to be fair for everyone and not just the property owner. We have a friend who pays $120,000 in real estate taxes in Pennington and gets nothing from the town .Some one has to do something.... "

Chuck S wrote on Jul 3, 2009 8:32 AM:

" Matt. What waste? The Rocky Hill School Board is entirely volunteer. This is a Corzine "smoke and mirrors trick". This is not about saving money this is about raising taxes! That's all Corzine has accomplished in his tenure.

As Main Street wrote, now Rocky Hill should have an opportunity to select which school district they would like to consolidate. "

Matt wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:36 PM:

" Finally! This will help eliminate all the waste we have here in our state. "

Main Street wrote on Jul 2, 2009 3:40 PM:

" Another fast one pulled by the Corzine administration. Rocky Hill should now send their kids to Princeton schools as Cranbury does. "

Think it through wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:11 PM:

" Rocky Hill parents will simply have to accept that for purposes of educating thier children, they are part of Mongomery Township, and they will vote in the election as folks in Montgomery do. Or, they could try and get one seat on the board assigned to their little hamlet, and get an over-sized impact on school board decisions...

They were living in a fantasy, now they are in reality - how much sway should 100 kids have over a properly-sized school district? "


Add your own comments:
(optional)
   


Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Although we do not have any obligation to monitor these comments, we reserve the right at all times to check the comments and to remove any information that is unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us at our sole discretion, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We also reserve the right to limit future participation by any user who violates these terms. All threats to systems or site infrastructure shall be assumed genuine in nature and will be reported to the appropriate law enforcement authorities


  TOP Jobsview all
Post A Job
  TOP Homesview all
Place An Ad
  TOP Cars view all
Sell Your Car






----------------------------------Neha