Home| News | Classifieds| Newsletter | Subscribe | Contact Us| Sitemap| Weather | Business Listings | Real Estate | Cars | Jobs Calendar| Friend | Follow | Feed |
|
|
|
Featured BrokersPrinceton Real Estate |
Comments are limited to 200 words or less. No to Health Bill wrote on Nov 20, 2009 10:52 PM: " If this bill should passed I hope it has mandatory drug testing for those who think this will really work. Wake up this is a joke this has nothing to do with healthcare. If this was the greatest thing since sliced bread then why are the politicians not opting to join? " Joanne wrote on Nov 20, 2009 5:22 PM: " This bill should die ASAP I'm a U.S. citizen living in Canada and the socialized medicine here is very different from what we as Americans are used to. When the government gets involved, it's not good. You can't call a specialist if you want one. Do you want to see a dermatologist? You have to go to your family physician first --- if you can find one! Not all doctors take new patients! Your family doctor will then get you a referral to a specialist. That can take months. You have no control as to WHEN you can see the specialist. The specialist will call you WHEN HE/SHE is available to see you. This is not what we should do to the U.S. system. Individual free choice is not an option under the Canadian system. I know because for 9 years I have lived under this system. This proposed healthcare bill sounds much too similar to what we have in Canada. It's not what you should be wanting as Americans. " Walt wrote on Nov 20, 2009 4:47 PM: " The bill does offer serious solutions to research, medicare, freedom of choice, the budget, and the credibility of the entire congress. It destroys all of them. " Runofplay wrote on Nov 20, 2009 4:39 PM: " Baloney, pure and simple. All of the purported benefits assume some very unlikely outcomes after the bill becomes law (which it won't). Seniors will go to the statehouse with pitchforks and torches if Christie doesn't have New Jersey "opt out" of the "public option" (a misnomer, since once the private insurance carriers bail out of the market, there won't be any "options" anymore). The Federal Government could not run Cash for Clunkers without screwing it up...why would anyone want them messing with our health care options? We will have LESS choice, not more! Keep your change! " Matt wrote on Nov 20, 2009 4:11 PM: " This Bill is a huge Mistake. Why should we trust our government to run our heathcare. We can reduce costs by making small changes to our current system. Tort Reform and Cross State lines for competition. This worked recently in NJ to lower car insurance costs. " Averal wrote on Nov 20, 2009 3:59 PM: " A mandate to buy health insurance without a strong public option is a gold mine for insurance companies. Delaying implementation 3-4 years gives them ample time to influence state elections with millions of dollars to protect their interests. Sure looks like politics as usual, the rich get richer....... " Add your own comments: Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Although we do not have any obligation to monitor these comments, we reserve the right at all times to check the comments and to remove any information that is unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us at our sole discretion, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We also reserve the right to limit future participation by any user who violates these terms. All threats to systems or site infrastructure shall be assumed genuine in nature and will be reported to the appropriate law enforcement authorities |
|
|
|
Ed wrote on Nov 21, 2009 10:05 PM: