Aberdeen joins other towns to fund legal action against utility’s proposal

Date:

Share post:

ABERDEEN — In a shared services action, the Aberdeen Township Council has approved a plan for the municipality to join forces with other Bayshore towns to fund legal and engineering costs for the fight against Jersey Central Power & Light’s (JCP&L) proposal to construct power transmission lines along the North Jersey Coast Line between Aberdeen and Red Bank.

Aberdeen agreed to fund an initial installment of $10,000 for legal and engineering services, according to a press release. The legal services will be performed by Bevan, Mosca & Guiditta, P.C., a Basking Ridge-based firm, whose founding principal, Murray E. Bevan, has advocated for clients before the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU). Earlier in his career, Bevan served a six-year term with the BPU.

- Advertisement -

Supporting engineering services are being handled by the Albany, New York, office of Maser Consulting, P.A., which has experience reviewing power transmission line projects in New Jersey.

The township’s commitment to the fund will be 10 percent of the costs incurred by the joint defense group of towns fighting JCP&L’s proposal. Aberdeen is contributing its share based upon the equalized true market value of all property in the township in comparison to the other towns involved.

“The Aberdeen Council is proud to have joined the other Bayshore towns in this fight against JCP&L’s Monmouth County Reliability project,” said Mayor Fred Tagliarini. “This financial commitment underscores our commitment to this battle, which has also drawn the support of Congressman Frank Pallone (D-Monmouth, Middlesex), our state representatives as well as the citizens group Residents Against Giant Electric (RAGE).”

According to Tagliarini, the towns’ joint action “is focusing on the necessity of the project and whether it will truly accomplish what JCP&L says. Assuming this effort takes more than a year, our Council is committed to providing additional funding under the established shared services formula.”

Aberdeen Deputy Mayor Margaret Montone noted that the financial commitment follows the Council’s unanimous adoption on Aug. 3 of a resolution opposing the project. Additionally, Tagliarini was among nine Bayshore mayors signing a joint letter opposing the project.

“Our Council has lined up against this project from the beginning, and we are committed to doing whatever is needed to defeat it,” Montone said.

As previously reported, the JCP&L project would use monopoles, some as high as 210 feet, to carry the transmission lines along a 10-mile stretch between electrical substations in Aberdeen and Red Bank with the goal to enhance reliability of service to the area.

Aberdeen’s Aug. 3 resolution stated that “less intrusive alternatives have not been given sufficient consideration” and urged the utility to “more fully consider less detrimental means to increase the reliability of its transmission services.”

“The Aberdeen Council is totally committed to this legal battle and pledges to review our financial contribution to the joint fund on an annual basis, as needed,” said Councilman Joseph Martucci.

Stay Connected

213FansLike
89FollowersFollow

Current Issue

Latest News

Related articles

New Jersey needs law to control invasive species

By Tom Gilbert What happens in Vegas may stay in Vegas, but what happens in New Jersey yards and...

Monmouth County News Briefs, Jan. 25

The Assembly Judiciary Committee on Jan. 19 cleared a bill sponsored by Assemblywoman Vicky Flynn (R-Monmouth) that would,...

What’s happening in nature during winter’s chill?

By Alison Mitchell New Jersey was quite frigid in December, but temperatures warmed as the new year arrived. So...

Middletown Sun and Tinton Falls-Eatontown Sun Datebook, Jan. 25

• New Jersey Blood Services, a division of New York Blood Center, is conducting blood drives which are...